The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Ingalill Rahm Hallberg

Ingalill Rahm Hallberg

Professor emerita

Ingalill Rahm Hallberg

Prioritization and resource allocation in health care. The views of older people receiving continuous public care and service.

Author

  • Elisabet Werntoft
  • Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
  • Anna-Karin Edberg

Summary, in English

Objective To describe the views of people, 65 years and over, receiving continuous public care and service, on prioritization and resource allocation in health care, in relation to gender, age, housing, health-related quality of life (QoL) and degree of activities of daily living (ADL) dependency.



Background How older people receiving continuous public care and service view prioritization and resource allocation in health care is sparsely investigated, although this group most certainly has the experience and also often is the target in discussions concerning prioritization. It is necessary, for democracy and for the development of new models of service delivery, to find out how people receiving long-term care and service view these issues.



Design 146 persons, 34 men (23%) and 112 women (77%), aged 66–100 years were interviewed face to face, following a structured questionnaire.



Results The respondents thought that the patients’ well-being, way of living and family situation should affect prioritization, not age per se. Resourcing of several health-care services were considered to be below what is required by a majority of the respondents. The respondents wanted doctors to decide on prioritization at an individual level and wanted higher taxes to finance increasing health-care costs. Although the respondents wanted publicly financed health care, a relatively high number were willing to pay for treatment.



Conclusions Knowledge of how older people receiving care and services, view prioritization and resource allocation has not previously been available. It seems that their views are in line with the Swedish Parliamentary Priority Commission which suggested that no account should be taken of age when allocating resources within the health-care system. Respondents’ age, gender, housing, health-related QoL and degree of dependency in ADL had limited influence on their views of resource allocation.

Department/s

  • Department of Health Sciences

Publishing year

2007

Language

English

Pages

117-128

Publication/Series

Health Expectations

Volume

10

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Gerontology, specializing in Medical and Health Sciences
  • Nursing

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1369-6513